Re: BHX
Posted: Thu May 18, 2023 4:43 pm
3 aircraft we could / should have had here.
The new home of EGPF Forum - the Glasgow Airport and aviation discussion group
https://gla.scot/forum/
London Gatwick - 79
And that's the primary reason BRS now handles 2 million more passengers than GLA despite it having relatively poor access (road only) and is located on the top of a hill
As a regular user of BRS I can confirm access is a freakin' nightmare and the airport is located in the arse-end of nowhere and is a shambles. Still putting us to shame though obviously.Tragic.Bearsden wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:37 amIts growth clearly affected its nearest competitor at Cardiff and obviously has very limited intercontinental traffic with Heathrow along the M4And that's the primary reason BRS now handles 2 million more passengers than GLA despite it having relatively poor access (road only) and is located on the top of a hill
Truly tragic. Frankly, without the domestic routes - particularly London - I do wonder if GLA would even be a base...GeorgeNTravels wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 7:40 pmLondon Gatwick - 79
London Luton - 24
Manchester - 21
Bristol - 17
Edinburgh - 9
Belfast International - 8
Liverpool - 7
Glasgow - 5
Birmingham - 3
That's what I have found, LGW might actually be higher than that.
It is tragic. EZY could/should be doing so much more from GLA, especially as their arch-rivals FR are practically non existent at GLA.southflyer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 5:36 pmTruly tragic. Frankly, without the domestic routes - particularly London - I do wonder if GLA would even be a base...GeorgeNTravels wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 7:40 pmLondon Gatwick - 79
London Luton - 24
Manchester - 21
Bristol - 17
Edinburgh - 9
Belfast International - 8
Liverpool - 7
Glasgow - 5
Birmingham - 3
That's what I have found, LGW might actually be higher than that.