Just looking into the Belgian operations. Whilst the crew seem to be all BRU based, there are nightstoping aircraft at Charleroi, Liege, Antwerp, Ostend, Lille and Paris (and also in Morocco). So from a capacity perspective, no obvious difference compared to having crew bases at these airports. Presumably the efficiencies of one large crew base outweigh what must be a very large taxi bill! If that exact model was applied in Scotland, ABZ and EDI would keep 'their' aircraft, with the 'benefit' for GLA being additional crew to support the ABZ & EDI nightstoppersHumberside wrote: ↑Fri Jul 03, 2020 10:24 pm [quote=atuk post_id=934 time=<a href="tel:1593759475">1593759475</a> user_id=75]No TUI bases in ABZ and EDI, leaving GLA in situ with perhaps much more non based flying covering BFS too. Something I have mooted for years as it would concentrate operations in one airport serving many others. Just like TUI Germany and Belgium already do.
[/quote]
Hi Humberside
Last summer TUB operated numerous W pattern flights from BRU and CRL through PMI.
By basing everything at GLA and NCL W pattern flights can cover ABZ, BFS and EDI slipping crews after a two sector day. The inside legs of the W pattern would see mid afternoon, early evening arrivals and departures. Just like TCX did on the ABZ-TFS and DLM and EDI-AYT routes operated by GLA staff and as TUI already do with the ABZ aircraft which normally operated in GLA and NCL on five days a week.