egpffqtv wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 8:25 pm
[quote=atuk post_id=11943 time=<a href="tel:1715278823">1715278823</a> user_id=75]
Long overdue and, quite frankly, this should have been in GLA first.
Like a lot of other routes that now have more seats ex that other airport that really should belong at GLA.
[/quote]
That all depends how hungry you are and how hard you pull out the stops to secure the business.
Like a lot of other routes that now have more seats ex that other airport that really should belong at GLA.
No route 'belongs'at GLA
Wrong choice of word perhaps. Stop being a wind up merchant.
Routes that traditionally have done better at GLA historically. There. Fixed it for you.
But now it’s “all the wan market BTW” so history doesn’t come into it these days. Accessibility, price, frequency, convenience, etc will influence the increased choices for the travelling public. On the plus side, GLA is a much more pleasant airport experience for said travellers.
Anyway, good news that we’re not being forgotten for once, but by the reaction in here you’d think the total opposite.