GKirk wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 9:23 pmThey are in the business to make money. If routes dont make money, they get dropped. As awwdababy says though,wouldnt be surprised to seethem reappear
That’s an oversimplification. Route networks are far more complex than just determining if Route A is profitable. There are many factors to consider, such as strategic importance, market demand, competition (both external and internal), and operational efficiency (slots, aircraft, crew), which all play a crucial role in the viability of a route.
At the fares easyJet was charging, it’s reasonable to assume the route was profitable. If it wasn’t, then the EDI-LIS route likely wouldn’t be either, considering its fares are significantly lower than those from GLA.
EasyJet's approach at GLA often seems inconsistent, with frequent changes in routes and schedules, as well as seasonal routes that should arguably be year-round (e.g., TFS, ACE, GVA). The airline’s dominant position at GLA allows it to operate with limited competition, leading to issues like erratic schedules (e.g., BRS) and poor frequencies on key routes (e.g., SOU, BHX). This lack of competition enables easyJet to drop profitable routes (e.g., MXP, RAK, MRS) without fear of losing market share, knowing they can always return later (e.g., RAK, MRS). A strong Ryanair base at GLA should help address these shortcomings.