PIK

Moderators: bill, Clive

Sharpal7
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu May 07, 2020 9:29 pm

Re: PIK

Post by Sharpal7 »

I know PIK has it's detractors but you can't beat it for variety of aircraft movements.

In the last 2 days, a couple of shortish visits revealed the following:

Big stuff C17, C130H, C130J, P8, A332, A320, B738, A321N, B762

Wee stuff PC12, TBM960

Biz CL350, Gulfstream V

Heligowobblies AW189, AW109

And the star... 51 year old HU-16B Albatross
Sharpal7
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu May 07, 2020 9:29 pm

Re: PIK

Post by Sharpal7 »

Sharpal7 wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2024 7:54 pm I know PIK has it's detractors but you can't beat it for variety of aircraft movements.

In the last 2 days, a couple of shortish visits revealed the following:

Big stuff C17, C130H, C130J, P8, A332, A320, B738, A321N, B762

Wee stuff PC12, TBM960

Biz CL350, Gulfstream V

Heligowobblies AW189, AW109

And the star... 51 year old HU-16B Albatross
Apologies wee typo. The Albat first flew in 1951 so it's 73 years old.
GKirk
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat May 02, 2020 7:34 am

Re: PIK

Post by GKirk »

Maximus Air Cargo An124 due around lunch time today.
Clive
Site Admin
Posts: 1469
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 8:59 pm

Re: PIK

Post by Clive »

GKirk wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:24 am Maximus Air Cargo An124 due around lunch time today.
Yeah, like this https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11383447
https://tinyurl.com/EGPFAmazon

Using this link cost nothing but your Amazon purchases can help me to fund the hosting of EGPF Forum and keep it free.
will1983
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 10:56 am

Re: PIK

Post by will1983 »

bill
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri May 01, 2020 7:51 pm

Re: PIK

Post by bill »

That's great news for the airport and local employment. PIK should be doing so much more of this type of business, ditch the terminal, and make some money.
G-WATP
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat May 02, 2020 10:50 pm

Re: PIK

Post by G-WATP »

bill wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2024 6:30 pm That's great news for the airport and local employment. PIK should be doing so much more of this type of business, ditch the terminal, and make some money.
It's profitable with the terminal, so why should they ditch it?
bill
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri May 01, 2020 7:51 pm

Re: PIK

Post by bill »

G-WATP wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2024 6:41 pm
bill wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2024 6:30 pm That's great news for the airport and local employment. PIK should be doing so much more of this type of business, ditch the terminal, and make some money.
It's profitable with the terminal, so why should they ditch it?
Profitable to who though? FR? Weatherspoons? Mrs.Miggins's cake shop? My point being that they could make so much more from other types of business, such as what was posted previously and a whole lot more. If they do turn a profit with pax,I doubt it could be that much.
atuk
Posts: 870
Joined: Fri May 01, 2020 8:19 pm

Re: PIK

Post by atuk »

bill wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2024 6:53 pm [quote=G-WATP post_id=13312 time=<a href="tel:1730486497">1730486497</a> user_id=119]
[quote=bill post_id=13309 time=<a href="tel:1730485823">1730485823</a> user_id=71]
That's great news for the airport and local employment. PIK should be doing so much more of this type of business, ditch the terminal, and make some money.
It's profitable with the terminal, so why should they ditch it?
[/quote]

Profitable to who though? FR? Weatherspoons? Mrs.Miggins's cake shop? My point being that they could make so much more from other types of business, such as what was posted previously and a whole lot more. If they do turn a profit with pax,I doubt it could be that much.
[/quote]

I’ve said it for years. Engineering/maintenance, cargo and a paint shop. If EMA and EXT can manage it and make a success of this then why can’t PIK.
FlyGLA
Posts: 185
Joined: Fri May 26, 2023 8:45 am

Re: PIK

Post by FlyGLA »

atuk wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:33 pm
I’ve said it for years. Engineering/maintenance, cargo and a paint shop. If EMA and EXT can manage it and make a success of this then why can’t PIK.
EXT and EMA both have their passenger operations.
Post Reply