Which might beg the question, if Chevron can do it, why go to Bangor, Maine ? Presumably different levels of maintenance ?
Loganair
Re: Loganair
I believe, though I could be wrong, that it's related to the Bollywood film.
-
Saabdriver
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2020 7:48 pm
Re: Loganair
JD was in Prestwick as part of the filming going on there.
Re: Loganair
-
Captainfrank
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 2:09 pm
Re: Loganair
A question for Saabdriver if I may. Has E145 G-RJXH been re-registered yet? Jethro's lists it as re-reg Sep 20 but FR24 is still showing it as G-RJXH.
-
awwdabaaby
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2020 5:35 pm
- Location: Larkhall
- Contact:
Re: Loganair
I had a look at planespotters and I think it was supposed to take G-SAJE but appears to still be flying with G-RJXHCaptainfrank wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:04 am A question for Saabdriver if I may. Has E145 G-RJXH been re-registered yet? Jethro's lists it as re-reg Sep 20 but FR24 is still showing it as G-RJXH.
-
Captainfrank
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 2:09 pm
Re: Loganair
The problem is when uk registered airframes are re-registered they retain their original ADS-B Hex code identity so although FR24 is showing G-RJXH it could in fact be G-safe.
-
Captainfrank
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 2:09 pm
Re: Loganair
correction should read G-SAJE, sorry.
-
Saabdriver
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2020 7:48 pm
Re: Loganair
It's still G-RJXH. It is going to be re-registered as G-SAJE but for some reason, hasn't happened yet - I don't know why! I'd guess it'll be done on the aircraft's next maintenance input to Aberdeen when it's on the ground for a few days anyway, just to get all of the paperwork done in good order over that down-time.