Where does the £61.6m figure come from, Clive? How does that relate to debt funding or loans to the business? I can't figure out your numbers?Clive wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2023 9:24 pmI think the headline figure should be the updated £61.6m that is glowing into the Scottish economy that wouldn’t have been if our government hadn’t acted to save it. A win for Scotland.Bearsden wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2023 9:08 pmBut what about the interest - £9.1m at Mar 2023 (circa £10.0m today) . . . now that's not a commercial loan!
You can see where management is heading - small Ryanair base so as not to put too much strain on the infrastructure, no need to replace terminal (I assume no RAAC or asbestos risk) just keep it maintained with a lick of paint and modest internal works, develop more non-based Ryanair flying in between the based aircraft rotations so no huge increase in staffing and keep using part-time / temporary contracts, and of course continue to develop other income streams
Remember they only have debt funding of £52.5m - AGS has approaching £1,000m
PIK
Re: PIK
Re: PIK
cammyboy wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2023 12:19 amWhere does the £61.6m figure come from, Clive? How does that relate to debt funding or loans to the business? I can't figure out your numbers?Clive wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2023 9:24 pmI think the headline figure should be the updated £61.6m that is glowing into the Scottish economy that wouldn’t have been if our government hadn’t acted to save it. A win for Scotland.Bearsden wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2023 9:08 pm
But what about the interest - £9.1m at Mar 2023 (circa £10.0m today) . . . now that's not a commercial loan!
You can see where management is heading - small Ryanair base so as not to put too much strain on the infrastructure, no need to replace terminal (I assume no RAAC or asbestos risk) just keep it maintained with a lick of paint and modest internal works, develop more non-based Ryanair flying in between the based aircraft rotations so no huge increase in staffing and keep using part-time / temporary contracts, and of course continue to develop other income streams
Remember they only have debt funding of £52.5m - AGS has approaching £1,000m
Not my figures. See the article. Scotland’s economy is better off with an operational airfield at PIK than closed. That is crystal clear.
https://tinyurl.com/EGPFAmazon
Using this link cost nothing but your Amazon purchases can help me to fund the hosting of EGPF Forum and keep it free.
Using this link cost nothing but your Amazon purchases can help me to fund the hosting of EGPF Forum and keep it free.
Re: PIK
Ok, thank you. Appreciate the response.Clive wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2023 6:26 am
Not my figures. See the article. Scotland’s economy is better off with an operational airfield at PIK than closed. That is crystal clear.
Re: PIK
Yes agree with all of that and now that FR have signed a new 5 year deal the doubt around that has gone. I don’t think it will be a substantial growth deal but another 5 years of more or less the same.Davieboy wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2023 10:07 amNot at all. Very few of the US military flights are to or from Ukraine. Many are to or from the Middle East and others are tanker operations. For example, two KC10s and two KC46s today providing air refuelling to US fighters returning back to the US from Europe.
In any event, there were loads of US military flights using Prestwick prior to the February 2022 hostilities in Ukraine. A Ukraine in NATO (or at least being re-equipped with US military kit) will need supplied for years. Prestwick's ideally placed for such flights to stopover, so the US should hopefully keep using it for some time. Note the accounts say "we will invest in facilities to support our military customers" so they wouldn't be considering that if their "main revenue stream" was likely to go "from a flowing river to a trickling burn".
The terminal's not closing anytime soon, not are Ryanair leaving anytime soon and there's a rich stream of revenue from the airport's hard work in securing military customers. Folks on here might have an easier time if they accepted those realities.
From GLA’s perspective the management there now have to secure a Ryanair base which will operate in addition to their PIK one.
It’s a shame AGS didn’t buy PIK when that was allegedly a possibility.
https://tinyurl.com/EGPFAmazon
Using this link cost nothing but your Amazon purchases can help me to fund the hosting of EGPF Forum and keep it free.
Using this link cost nothing but your Amazon purchases can help me to fund the hosting of EGPF Forum and keep it free.
Re: PIK
I struggle to see why Ryanair would need / want another base in Central Scotland
Demand is not infinite - a third base would surely be at the expense of another airline's traffic or dilute the traffic at its two existing bases (just add up the number of aircraft based in Scotland by easyJet, Jet2, Ryanair and TUI Airways and critically their operating pattern mix between outbound and inbound markets)
I would need to do a full market by market analysis to understand the + and - but the combined EDI/GLA/PIK annual passenger traffic is still 2.9m down on 2018 of which GLA is 2.6m and 2.7m down on 2019 of which GLA is 1.7m
Re: PIK
A new expression of interest in purchasing PIK has been made acccording to reports. No further details known
https://tinyurl.com/EGPFAmazon
Using this link cost nothing but your Amazon purchases can help me to fund the hosting of EGPF Forum and keep it free.
Using this link cost nothing but your Amazon purchases can help me to fund the hosting of EGPF Forum and keep it free.