Ryanair: Could my prayers be answered?

[awwdabaaby]

What’s the S24 EZY growth from the 6th A/C, they’ve also got a lot of away-based flying (ALC) that was originally done by GLA based A/C in the past.

Just saying.....

https://gla.scot/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=801

Page 2

[will1983]

Sorry can’t see any mention of passenger number growth for S24 vs S23 in that Page 2?

[Bearsden]

A few interesting assumptions / calculations above . . . but nothing concrete to bridge the 1.3m

The cynic in me reflects on the need for AGS to renegotiate its bank loans in June this year

[Clive]

A few interesting assumptions / calculations above . . . but nothing concrete to bridge the 1.3m

The cynic in me reflects on the need for AGS to renegotiate its bank loans in June this year

Notwithstanding, the airport obviously run numbers for planning purposes and have projected they will handle over 8.5m pax this year so if that quote from Ronald is correct then something major is happening. To me it can only be a Ryanair base with a summer start which can add a million pax in a 6 month period.

Veering off topic but I hear MAG - owners of STN, EMA and MAN, may be interested in purchasing the airport from AGS.

[Iain]

A few interesting assumptions / calculations above . . . but nothing concrete to bridge the 1.3m

The cynic in me reflects on the need for AGS to renegotiate its bank loans in June this year

Airports can certainly predict to a reasonable accuracy what their pax numbers during the next year will be. If they're allegedly knowingly inflating predicted pax numbers to artificially increase the value of the airport as an asset, is that not somewhat questionable?

Notwithstanding, the airport obviously run numbers for planning purposes and have projected they will handle over 8.5m pax this year so if that quote from Ronald is correct then something major is happening. To me it can only be a Ryanair base with a summer start which can add a million pax in a 6 month period.

What about a Wizz base?

Veering off topic but I hear MAG - owners of STN, EMA and MAN, may be interested in purchasing the airport from AGS.

Iirc there were rumours they were interested when a GLA was last sold/spun out to AGS. Personally I would see this as a positive I think.

A certain other Scottish airport also appears to be coming onto the market, so I wonder if that might attract their attention - Or perhaps they might see GLA as more attractive cause it has more untapped potential and will probably be cheaper!

[Bearsden]

[/quote]
Veering off topic but I hear MAG - owners of STN, EMA and MAN, may be interested in purchasing the airport from AGS.
[/quote]

That would support my view that AGS 'has run its course' for Ferrovial / Macquarie

[Clive]

A few interesting assumptions / calculations above . . . but nothing concrete to bridge the 1.3m

The cynic in me reflects on the need for AGS to renegotiate its bank loans in June this year

Airports can certainly predict to a reasonable accuracy what their pax numbers during the next year will be. If they're allegedly knowingly inflating predicted pax numbers to artificially increase the value of the airport as an asset, is that not somewhat questionable?

Notwithstanding, the airport obviously run numbers for planning purposes and have projected they will handle over 8.5m pax this year so if that quote from Ronald is correct then something major is happening. To me it can only be a Ryanair base with a summer start which can add a million pax in a 6 month period.

What about a Wizz base?

Veering off topic but I hear MAG - owners of STN, EMA and MAN, may be interested in purchasing the airport from AGS.

Iirc there were rumours they were interested when a GLA was last sold/spun out to AGS. Personally I would see this as a positive I think.

A certain other Scottish airport also appears to be coming onto the market, so I wonder if that might attract their attention - Or perhaps they might see GLA as more attractive cause it has more untapped potential and will probably be cheaper!

Aena are said to be interested in that off topic airport. We’ll leave it at that and not discuss the whys and wherefores of that.

A Wizz base at GLA would of course be massively welcome and a godsend in terms of connectivity, clawing back some market share and growth but I just think in terms of getting people to fly who otherwise would not be going anywhere, Ryanair can get the numbers even in routes no one would think viable. I read years ago that they don’t even bother with route analysis before launching whatever floats their boat.

[G-WATP]

S24 flights for the existing destinations (except WMI) are now showing on the app albeit not bookable yet and showing as 'sold out' (except DUB, which has been bookable for months). All look to be done by away based aircraft.

[Clive]

S24 flights for the existing destinations (except WMI) are now showing on the app albeit not bookable yet and showing as 'sold out'. All look to be done by away based aircraft.

That could be a good sign. At least what you have pointed out shows some movement as there was nothing for S24 except DUB showing yesterday. I see they are all low frequency like twice a week. If a GLA base is about to get loaded onto the system there’s bound to be more flights to AGP and ALC for example, along with a range of new destinations. Here’s hoping.

[AD1]

Hi, friend of mine is Ryanair crew who says they’ve been told they may be able to transfer from EDI based crew to Glasgow based crew depending on factors. Last time they advertised this was for Prestwick but they’ve been told it could be a mix of GLA and PIK “to support future possible flying activity in the region”.